<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Advances in medicine &#187; Osteoporosis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/category/osteoporosis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:18:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>BONE MASS IN PHYSICIANS: DISCUSSION</title>
		<link>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/2009/12/bone-mass-in-physicians-discussion.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/2009/12/bone-mass-in-physicians-discussion.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Osteoporosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone mineral density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osteopenia calcium intake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/?p=1177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
DISCUSSION
In this study, 68% of the physicians had low bone mass (12% had osteoporosis and 56% had osteopenia). We are unable to identify similar, published data on bone mass in a cohort of physicians; thus, this is a unique study. The results of NHANES III showed that the prevalence of low bone mass increases with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/2009/12/bone-mass-in-physicians-discussion.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BONE MASS IN PHYSICIANS: RESULTS</title>
		<link>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/2009/12/bone-mass-in-physicians-results.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/2009/12/bone-mass-in-physicians-results.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Osteoporosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone mineral density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osteopenia calcium intake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/?p=1175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were no differences between the physicians&#8217; baseline age and sex demographics (Table 1). African Americans were the largest group studied (32%; 14 men, 18 women). The Asians were the next largest group (31%; 14 men, 17 women). The African group (18%) had 14 men and four women, whereas the Caribbean group (16%) had seven [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/2009/12/bone-mass-in-physicians-results.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BONE MASS IN PHYSICIANS: Methods and Materials</title>
		<link>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/2009/12/bone-mass-in-physicians-methods-and-materials.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/2009/12/bone-mass-in-physicians-methods-and-materials.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Osteoporosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone mineral density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osteopenia calcium intake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/?p=1173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A total of 100 staff physicians were enrolled in the study. There were 52 men and 48 women with an age range of 27-79 years (mean 43.40±14.3). The study population was composed of the following groups: African (n=18), African-American (n=32), Asian (n=31), Caribbean (n=16), Caucasian (n=2) and Hispanic (n=l). The exclusion criteria included current pregnancy, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/2009/12/bone-mass-in-physicians-methods-and-materials.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BONE MASS IN PHYSICIANS</title>
		<link>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/2009/12/bone-mass-in-physicians.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/2009/12/bone-mass-in-physicians.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Osteoporosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone mineral density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osteopenia calcium intake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/?p=1171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
INTRODUCTION
Osteoporosis is a group of skeletal disorders characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural disruption of bone tissue that leads to fractures. Based on the results of bone densitometry, the World Health Organization (WHO) study group defined osteoporosis as a bone mass greater than 2.5 standard deviation (SD) below peak bone mass (T-score) and osteopenia [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.advances-in-medicine.com/2009/12/bone-mass-in-physicians.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
